On a weekly, and often daily basis, we hear from people incarcerated in this nation’s jails and prisons seeking help. We hear from people who are not receiving the medical care they need and who are terrified that they will suffer permanent injury from the jail or prison’s failures to properly provide necessary medical care […]
Ninth Circuit recognizes “prison to homelessness pipeline, ” upholds (in part) Seattle ordinance forbidding landlords from adverse action based on criminal history. This spring, the Ninth Circuit decided Yim v. City of Seattle, 63 F.4th 783, 787 (9th Cir. 2023), which despite being a Section 1983 case brought by landlords against the City of Seattle, […]
U.S. Supreme Court holds that Section 1983 procedural due process claim accrues when state-court litigation ends Reed v. Goertz, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine when a cause of action accrues (and thus when the statute of limitations period starts running) for a plaintiff’s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that his conviction violated […]
It’s sadly a common fact pattern: a member of the community is involved in an altercation with the police; the police use excessive force; but it’s the community member who gets charged with a criminal offense. As we’ve reported earlier here, a related criminal case presents a sticky wicket for litigants hoping to see civil […]
Multiple dwellings and probable cause for search warrants Blight v. City of Manteca, 944 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2019) Manteca, California! Nestled about halfway between Modesto and Stockton off of Highway 99, it is the hometown of former NBA point guard and coach Scott Brooks – an undrafted, 5’11″ bundle of grit and inspiration. But […]
Gang evidence “almost always prejudicial.” Gilmore v. Lockard, 936 F.3d 857, 859 (9th Cir. 2019) In Gilmore v. Lockard, 936 F.3d 857, 859 (9th Cir. 2019), the Ninth Circuit reversed a defense verdict in favor of prison officials who, a prisoner alleged, used excessive force against him and then delayed his access to medical care. […]
Discrimination in the jury selection process is an ongoing reality within the American criminal justice system, but measures have been taken for over a century to address the issue at both the national and state levels. The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments were ratified in 1868 and 1870, respectively, guaranteeing Black men the right to vote […]
Even though Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944)-which condoned the forced relocation of all persons of Japanese ancestry in certain West coast zones during World War II pursuant to Executive Order 9066-was broadly criticized for decades within the legal profession and by American society at large, it was not expressly overruled by the […]
Taylor v. Cty. of Pima,2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 1545 (9th Cir., January 17, 2019) This case addresses the scenario where a defendant was pretty obviously wrongfully convicted, but then cuts a time-served deal to get out of custody. Can he still seek civil justice? Not to spoil the ending, but the dissenting opinion opens with […]
Sandoval v. Cty. of Sonoma, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 36147 (9th Cir. Dec. 21, 2018) California Vehicle Code § 14602.6(a)(1) provides that a peace officer may impound a vehicle for 30 days if the vehicle’s driver has never been issued a driver’s license. Local law-enforcement officials carried out this job enthusiastically, even for persons with […]
– McKenzie Scott PC: Fighting for the Little Guy
The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only; it is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship with those accessing the website and the firm is not intending to provide any individuals with legal advice as to any particular matter. Additionally, prior results achieved by the firm do not represent a guarantee or prediction of similar results in any other cases. The facts of each case are unique. This website may contain attorney advertising.
@ Copyright 2024 McKenzie Scott Civil Rights & Criminal Defense Lawyers. All Rights Reserved | Sitemap